Skip to content

Concept

Scapegoating

violence concentrated on the center

Ask AI about Scapegoating

Scapegoating is also always against the center--even when the occupant of the center leads it. The claim implicit in scapegoating is that the center has been usurped by someone "behind the scenes."

From the Archive

To scapegoat is to do violence to someone who is, if not innocent, at any rate no guiltier than his fellows. More precisely, it is to treat someone whose guilt is at most quantitatively greater than the others' as though it were transcendentally greater, so that the violence that had been diffused over the entire community comes to be unanimously directed from the innocent collectivity to the one

But, on the other hand, as an epistemological operation, scapegoating is the originary model of selection in general.

Scapegoating is a practice of subtracting likeness from the othered, making likeness among those who do the othering less threatening; to acknowledge various ways of identifying the same amongst the like is to make it possible to lower and raise the threshold of differentiation as needed.

Scapegoating requires some “mark” be attributed to the scapegoat–the more that mark singles out the scapegoat as an object of attention, and as dangerous or subversive in some way to the community, the more it would set in motion the stampede.

we instead refrain from scapegoating (we learn to detect signs of accelerating convergent attention) because scapegoating is always an attempt to disorder the center by prepping us to look for indications of a hidden usurper behind it.

The targeting of the occupant of the center is always extremely dangerous and is most likely the original scapegoating (the scapegoating of marginal figures and groups is very much a modern appropriation of the concept—those with real or perceived power are scapegoated [that “perceived” can do a lot of work, though])—it necessarily prefigures civil war precisely in the hope that it can be unanimous.

The model of scapegoating is the model of attention in general.

AI Overview

— AI-generated synthesis. The archive passages above are the primary source.

In Center Study, scapegoating is not first of all the persecution of the weak or marginal. It is communal violence and resentment converging on the center — and it carries an implicit claim that the center has been secretly usurped "by someone behind the scenes." Even when the occupant of the center leads the scapegoating, it is aimed against the center as such.

It is the originary model of selection, and of attention in general: to scapegoat is to do violence to someone no guiltier than the rest, subtracting likeness from a victim by attributing to them some distinguishing "mark." The standing alternative is the discipline of deferral — detecting the gathering of attention into a lynching and refusing it, distributing power rather than concentrating it on a single sacrificeable figure.

Across the Corpus

How this idea is developed elsewhere in the archive, earliest to latest.

The Gospel narratives reveal that sacrality is created through victimization. In The Scapegoat , Girard distinguishes two basic hermeneutic modes. On the one hand is the mythic mode, which begins by demonizing the other as the prelude to sacrificial violence, and which ends by sacralizing or deifying the scapegoat victim. The mythic mode displaces human…

For Gans, indeed, scapegoating and human sacrifice is introduced much later, in the wake of the organization of communities around the so-called “Big Man,” who centralizes the distribution of resources. Once the origin of goods is centralized, in other words, so can be the origin of contagion. The Big Man both defers violence by deflecting resentments…

Against this backdrop, then, are we invited to engage with Michael Jackson, away from the usual tabloid gossip which often finds itself on either side of the divide, lauding the sorrows of Michael’s childhood when publicly expedient or crucifying him to no end and in equal measure— selling us commercially estheticized versions of either his resentment or…

The most important argument for mimetic theorists who wish to challenge liberalism to make, in fact, is that nothing in the condition of the powerless triggers scapegoating tendencies; quite to the contrary, it is always those who have or are believed to have “too much” power who are scapegoated. Even when we can observe instances of scapegoating targeting…

Third, while all scapegoating, or violent centralizing, obfuscates and produces regrettable actions, the most dangerous violent centralizing, the type to which all others tend, is that of the occupant of the social center: the usurpatory motives we might attribute to the occupant of the center, motives which serve as an anchor giving pattern to facts and…

I’ll repeat the moral-political difference that follows here. Rather than, as we imagine ourselves doing on the Big Scene, expelling the tyrant (and his supporters and instruments) in the name of the exemplary (scapegoated) victim, we instead refrain from scapegoating (we learn to detect signs of accelerating convergent attention) because scapegoating is…

Saturday, March 18th, 2006GA and Mimetic Theory II: The Scapegoat

Because the term “scapegoating” presupposes a higher level of consciousness on the part of its user than in those engaged in the act it describes, it forecloses ethical reasoning; any pretext furnished by the participants is invalid on its face, an example of bad faith or méconnaissance . It is the postmodern, post-Holocaust intuition of the inherent…

Saturday, November 24th, 2001Scapegoating after September 11

Scapegoating or “emissary victimage” is the defining operation of René Girard’s originary scene. The proto-human group, caught up in the violent chaos of “mimetic crisis,” finds unanimity by directing its aggression against a single, marginal individual; his death ends the crisis and he is subsequently venerated as the bringer of peace. Although my own…

Sacrificial ritual and “scapegoating” in general focus the energy of this resentment on targets whose destruction does not endanger the social order as a whole. Between societies, war often serves the function of directing resentment away from the social order; if the ideal “scapegoat” is one whose destruction does not damage this order, then a fortiori…

Saturday, December 25th, 2004White Guilt I

In a prehuman hierarchy, the participants’ hostility, which we should not yet call resentment, would be directed at those higher in the pecking order. These animal societies permit the one-on-one externalization of aggression, either in an actual fight for supremacy or in a gesture of ritualized submission. What is specific to human resentment is its…

Key Texts

Scapegoating after September 11

Develops scapegoating as violence against the center.

Selving

Develops scapegoating as violence against the center.

The Global Civil War of Position

Develops scapegoating as violence against the center.

Transposing the Scene

Develops scapegoating as violence against the center.

Thirdness and the Same Sentence

Develops scapegoating as violence against the center.

GA and Mimetic Theory II: The Scapegoat

Develops scapegoating as violence against the center.

Related Concepts

Ask AI →
StartSearchGlossaryAsk AIBrowse