Skip to content

Verbatim quote · from the corpus

Center study assumes that any tracing of any idiom to its possibility and emergence will lead us back to the originary hypothesis, while anthropomorphics assumes that the originary hypothesis can only find its proof of work and concept in the jarring of an idiom. Anthropomorphics, then, is not so interested in reducing or explaining, metalanguage like, any discourse to the abstract concepts developed in the center study factory as in infiltrating other discourses and having them approximate or become successor discourses to the originary sign. If we were all deliberately replicating the originary event in every utterance we’d all be speaking in constantly novel ways that would need to be apprehended in the stream of things, and this is what the concept of anthropomorphics is indicating. The more elaborate conceptual architectures I have worked on and promised (originary grammar) are really just technological means of bridging such approximations—creating a little eddy within the current to get a view and chart a course.

Adam Katz, Idiom and the differend · Mar 01, 2026 · Bouvard Substack

Evidences

Read in context →center.study/q/92c594c13df3
GuideSearchConceptsAsk AIArchive