Skip to content

Verbatim quote · defining passage

So, there’s no sense in which language is more real than metalanguage; and metalanguage is just as much a use of language as any other: it directs attention to uses of language, while language directs our attention to the centered world, but language is itself part of the centered world. Metalanguage is the pedagogical dimension within language, which means that the primary sin of metalanguage is assessing uses of language without issuing operable imperatives: assessments of the language use of others devoid of operable imperatives is the way I would define “cant.”

Adam Katz, On the Culling of Cant · Apr 2018 · GABlog

Evidences

Read in context →center.study/q/684bf6416f1c
GuideSearchConceptsAsk AIArchive