Skip to content

Verbatim quote · from the corpus

So, maybe no one has wanted to center political thinking on the question of succession because no one has ever felt confidence in any answer. But it really is the best way into theorizing governance: any regime that could present its form of succession as representing a form of continuity that could be traced back with as little question as possible to the origin of the social order itself would surely be the best possible regime. This is a very economical approach. Anthropomorphics presents a solution: the present occupant of the center chooses his successor. This follows from the rejection of any form of imperium in imperio , or “super-sovereignty”: if there is some rule of succession independent of the ruler, then the interpreter of that rule is sovereign. And, of course, the ruler could choose his son, or a family member—and that would sometimes be the best choice. But sometimes it wouldn’t be, and we can therefore derive a rule for selecting a successor: whoever is going to succeed as ruler must have the character to set aside his personal and familial interests for the sake of the country.

Adam Katz, The Imperative of the Occupant of the Center · Jun 2020 · GABlog

Evidences

Read in context →center.study/q/1f84c0fba605
GuideSearchConceptsAsk AIArchive