Bouvard on Vance and Constitutional Equal Protection

It's reasonable to assume that a candidate who relies on the votes of Carlson slander enjoyers will refrain, in office, from protecting those victimized by others those slander enjoyers enjoy. That is, Vance would be the first president I can think of who can't be counted on to

provide equal protection under the laws for all American citizens if it were politically inconvenient to do so. (The first president in a long time, anyway, representing a breach in political tradition.)

@Imperius__13 I have in mind violent criminal assaults. And discrimination against white men has been under the law, albeit unjustified, badly written, ridiculously interpreted and applied law which could, moreover, have been overridden by presidents with sufficient political courage.

@Imperius__13 Even if it angers Tucker fans?

@Imperius__13 What is Carlson calling for now?

@Imperius__13 But Carlson himself is not the question. Probably nobody pays attention to David Duke, but if a leading presidential candidate insisted he was an important conservative voice and had his son working in his office it would be worthy of note. People would inquire.

@Imperius__13 I don't think that's possible.