Megyn Kelly has made Mark Levin seem cool, calm and composed by comparison.
@Imperius__13 I had the below in mind:
@Imperius__13 Megyn Kelly is screeching about someone quoting her on her admiration for Nick Fuentes. She is obviously lying here about what she "was speaking about"--unless you believe it is Fuentes's "points about the gov't" that especially attract young white men.
@Imperius__13 Which grievances of young men does she refer to?
@Imperius__13 So, you're assuming that's what she's doing. No thanks. I'll consider "You're a pathetic misinformation whore" and "Fuck you & your lies" to be "screeching," especially since, as is invariably the case with these people, no lies or misinformation has been cited.
@Imperius__13 What was dishonest in it?
@Imperius__13 There is no chance I would listen to these people talk for an hour or, really, even fifteen minutes. Nor am I obliged to do so. If someone can point to an illuminating context for what they say in these snippets, let them. I never see it, though.
@Imperius__13 Nor does the poster she's responding to say she does. He points to a rather prominent (indeed, defining) point Fuentes makes "about our country" and reasonably wonders whether Kelly thinks there's "value to be derived from that." Nothing dishonest at all.
@Imperius__13 I don't know how much influence I have and I don't chart its fluctuations. If agreeing that someone was dishonest when he wasn't increases my influence I'll do without it, or at least that vector. You shift topics constantly when you can't answer questions. Have you noticed?
@Imperius__13 I just did a couple of posts back: how was the poster Kelly was referring to dishonest? I pointed out that he wasn't and then the issue became my grumpiness and influence.
@Imperius__13 She said Fuentes was brilliant and had some good ideas while the idea he is best and most justifiably known for is that Jews control the US. In her hysterical response to him she doesn't quite disavow that "idea"--she just says she wasn't talking about that idea but... which?
@Imperius__13 And this in the course of a discussion where she also wants to insist on her right to ask whether Israel killed Charlie Kirk. Right to ask, but not responsibility to try to answer--these are not people deserving "due diligence." I don't have to listen to hours of this swill.
@Imperius__13 And, by the way, she has a lot of her own interesting ideas about Jews here as well, so maybe her admiration for Fuentes is not about how he expresses "grievances" (like affordability, or whatever, presumably).
@Imperius__13 But feel free to listen to the whole thing yourself and tell me how I've been unfair or misguided.
@Imperius__13 Yes, Fuentes is known for his opinions on the budget process and the filibuster. Enough of this.
@Imperius__13 Enough.